Lock file maintenance (main) - #3370
Conversation
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:49 AM UTC · Completed 4:58 AM UTC |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
ReviewFindingsInfo
Previous runLooks good to me Previous run (2)Looks good to me Previous run (3)Looks good to me Previous run (4)Looks good to me Previous run (5)Looks good to me Previous run (6)Looks good to me Previous run (7)Looks good to me Previous run (8)Looks good to me Previous run (9)Looks good to me Previous run (10)Looks good to me Previous run (11)Looks good to me Previous run (12)Looks good to me Previous run (13)Looks good to me Previous run (14)Looks good to me Previous run (15)Looks good to me Previous run (16)Review — ApproveLock file maintenance — 4 transitive dependency version bumps in
Supply chain verification
This PR contains two beneficial security updates. The "Possible security concern" label reflects that dependency updates warrant scrutiny — the review confirms these changes are safe and recommended. Previous run (17)Review — ApprovePR: #3370 — Lock file maintenance npm dependencies (main) SummaryAutomated lock file maintenance bumping four transitive npm dependencies to their latest versions:
Review dimensions
VerdictClean lock file maintenance. All dependency bumps are valid within their semver constraints, no structural changes to the dependency graph, and no security concerns. Safe to merge. Previous run (18)Review — ApprovePR: #3370 — Lock file maintenance npm dependencies (main) SummaryAutomated lockfile maintenance refreshing 4 transitive npm dependencies of
Security Assessment
Dimensional Coverage
This lockfile maintenance PR is safe to merge. The Previous run (19)Looks good to me Labels: Lock file maintenance PR updating npm dependencies fits the 'dependencies' label. Previous run (20)ReviewFindingsHigh
Low
Labels: PR contains a dependency version bump that requires manual verification for supply chain integrity |
976122f to
4cf619c
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 2:22 AM UTC · Completed 2:29 AM UTC |
4cf619c to
86252df
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:46 AM UTC · Completed 4:54 AM UTC |
86252df to
873507f
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:44 AM UTC · Completed 4:50 AM UTC |
873507f to
ec5a10d
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 2:17 AM UTC · Completed 2:23 AM UTC |
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:45 AM UTC · Completed 4:54 AM UTC Commit: |
c5bc809 to
adad5cc
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:07 AM UTC · Completed 4:18 AM UTC Commit: |
adad5cc to
fa4fbb6
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:27 AM UTC · Completed 4:37 AM UTC Commit: |
fa4fbb6 to
2dbfcf7
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:10 AM UTC · Completed 4:18 AM UTC Commit: |
2dbfcf7 to
472da5f
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:08 AM UTC · Completed 4:18 AM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-6 · Effort: high · Cost: $2.00 |
472da5f to
7ad806d
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:24 AM UTC · Completed 4:36 AM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-6 · Effort: high · Cost: $3.16 |
7ad806d to
e2ec22e
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:17 AM UTC · Completed 4:28 AM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-6 · Effort: high · Cost: $1.71 |
e2ec22e to
0cb67f8
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:19 AM UTC · Completed 4:29 AM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-6 · Effort: high · Cost: $2.62 |
|
Risk Assessment: low (1/5) DetailsTiny lockfile-only bump (6 lines, 1 file) by Renovate bot with no protected paths, no security-sensitive files, and no CI changes; only the dependency-file signal elevates any dimension. Previous runRisk Assessment: low (1/5) DetailsLock file maintenance by a Renovate bot with minimal change size (1 file, 24 lines), no protected or security-sensitive paths, and no recent churn — routine dependency update. |
Signed-off-by: red-hat-konflux <126015336+red-hat-konflux[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
0cb67f8 to
85befa4
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 4:29 AM UTC · Completed 4:34 AM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-7 · Effort: high · Cost: $2.31 |
This PR contains the following updates:
Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.
🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (UTC)
* 0-4 * * *)🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
To execute skipped test pipelines write comment
/ok-to-test.Documentation
Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.