Skip to content

[GStreamer][WesterosQuirk] set low-latency-mode property - #1629

Closed
goruklu wants to merge 1 commit into
WebPlatformForEmbedded:wpe-2.46from
goruklu:wpe-2.46-westerosquirk-set-low-latency-mode-property
Closed

[GStreamer][WesterosQuirk] set low-latency-mode property#1629
goruklu wants to merge 1 commit into
WebPlatformForEmbedded:wpe-2.46from
goruklu:wpe-2.46-westerosquirk-set-low-latency-mode-property

Conversation

@goruklu

@goruklu goruklu commented Mar 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Amlogic uses "low-latency-mode" Westeros sink property instead of "immediate-mode" for lowest latency.
bfbdaec

Build-Tests Layout-Tests
✅ 🛠 wpe-246-amd64-build ✅ 🧪 wpe-246-amd64-layout
✅ 🛠 wpe-246-arm32-build ❌ 🧪 wpe-246-arm32-layout

Amlogic uses "low-latency-mode"  Westeros sink property instead of "immediate-mode" for lowest latency.
@goruklu
goruklu requested a review from philn as a code owner March 3, 2026 04:03
@emutavchi
emutavchi requested a review from modeveci March 3, 2026 11:52
@modeveci
modeveci requested review from eocanha and removed request for philn March 3, 2026 14:13
@goruklu
goruklu marked this pull request as draft March 13, 2026 19:05
@goruklu

goruklu commented Mar 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

We will try to re-use the immediate-mode property for Amlogic Westeros-sink as well.
Westeros sink will have to handle different codecs properly.

@eocanha

eocanha commented Mar 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

(Copying comment from #1628 (comment) here)

Regarding the immediate-output property (I'm assuming you're talking about that one), I'd like to comment that it's currently causing issues on live game streaming for some online services. This is not directly related to this PR, but I still think it's worth to mention.

Have a look at #1572 (comment)

@eocanha

eocanha commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We will try to re-use the immediate-mode property for Amlogic Westeros-sink as well. Westeros sink will have to handle different codecs properly.

As per this comment, I'm assumint that this Draft PR, as well as #1628, is no longer needed. Please, feel free to reopen it if you still want to use different property names.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants