There is an inconsistency in ECMA-427 1st Edition for the term normalisation/normalization because we use "normalisation" and "normalise" in the text (e.g. Clause 2 - Conformance) but we have normalization_rules as a property name in the PURL type definition schema for the name, version and subpath components.
Should we update the PURL type properties to 'normalisation_rules` for consistency?
There is an inconsistency in ECMA-427 1st Edition for the term normalisation/normalization because we use "normalisation" and "normalise" in the text (e.g. Clause 2 - Conformance) but we have
normalization_rulesas a property name in the PURL type definition schema for the name, version and subpath components.Should we update the PURL type properties to 'normalisation_rules` for consistency?